Three special questions every successful entrepreneur asks

Successful entrepreneurs are constantly asking three key questions –

1. ‘what isn’t working’
2. ‘why isn’t it working’ and
3. ‘can I do anything about it’?

These three questions are the most important questions in the entrepreneurs vocabluary and a lifetime can be spent on developing the skills and abilities to answer those as successfully as possible.

So, what might these questions mean in practice? Let’s have a look…

Well, you might say that the European labour market isn’t working. That is, unemployment levels are much higher than in Asian countries or the US and the long term unemployment rates are far higher too. Why isn’t employment working? Well, mainly due to taxes, costs and the bureacratic burden of employees.

But is there anything you can do about this? Well, taxes are political – so let’s not go there – but knowing how the structure of the labour market works means that companies would be attracted to simple and cost efficient ways to hire staff. So, the freelance and contractor sectors of employment are the growth areas. And, therefore, can you build a business to meet this increasing demand?

Another typical complaint – house prices – might lead to a different answer. That is, house prices in the UK are very high – relative to earnings - and therefore it is hard to sell your property and move to another. This has all sorts of macro-economic disadvantages, but leaving those aside, it has lead many entrepreneurs to believe that the solution lies in either a direct sale approach to house sales (ie. cut out the agent) or a digital online database (property portals).

Now, let’s ask why houses don’t sell easily in the UK? Well, high price is one reason, but is it the agent? Evidence todate of 10 years of would be websites dedicated to cutting out the no-win/ no-fee agent – and replacing with a fixed adverting charge have failed to make any inroads into the market.

In fact, as it becomes harder to sell property, so it seems that the commission motivated agent in the middle is critical to ensuring that the two parties agree and close the deal.

Equally, the rapid proliferation of property portals suggests that property sales are going online? But no… instead, property adverts are going online – but the quality of those adverts is poorer now than before. Why?

Well, the agents treat the property portals as an advertising cost and therefore, don’t want to display all their stock at once – only those properties most likely to generate sales leads.

Hence, the all comprehensive promise of property portals is falling apart and anyone wanting to buy a house now has to look at multiple websites to see what they might buy.

It seems that property and property sales are – once again – returning to the existing structure of buyers, sellers and media used to generate leads.

Hence, it seems that business plans dedicated to changing the way that we buy and sell our houses have failed.

Now, the quickest way to make houses easy to buy and sell would be to cut their price in half – and that could be achieved by a massive increase in the availability of cheap land. Ah, back to politics then.

So, as we all agree, there is something deeply inefficient about how property is transacted. But there isn’t an obvious way to change it – other than by radical politically lead reform. Which isn’t easy either. It is a bit like capitalism – it is the least worst system.

The risk is that many young entrepreneurs may spend too much time (and money) attempting to make perfect an imperfect system.  Sometimes we just have to accept that there is ‘nothing much we can do to help’. If so, then find out fast and move on.

You see, often the successful entrepreneur is portrayed as someone who never gives up – where as, in fact, he (or she) may simply be willing to give up faster – and therefore find something that works quicker.

If you perfect the use of our three special questions then you’ll get there faster, waste less money and time and achieve a greater result.

Will Hiring Freelancers Lead to Success or Failure?

…that you have to hire the best. … and hiring the best means you have to offer the full time employment – the best package – a full time employment contract and for CEO’s golden handshakes to welcome them and golden parachutes should they fail, share options if they don’t etc.

And therefore, you might think, if I don’t offer a full employment contract why would they ever leave their current employment to join my organisation?

Let me be blunt about this. This is rubbish. People will join your organisation mainly for the opportunity and excitement you offer – much less for the terms of a contract.

Here are six reasons why freelancers are better than employees;

Firstly, freelancing and contracting is more fun and the freelancer earns more money. The freelancer gains by being treated as an equal – they are in business too – albeit for themselves and the relationship between you and the freelancer is a much more grown up one. No longer do freelancers expect you to provide for them – as a parent might to a child – instead, it is a relationship of equals. This benefits the person hiring the freelancer just as it benefits the freelancer him or herself.

Second, freelancing and contracting allows your team to work on projects in natural bursts. It is more like going to college, you work hard or very hard for 10 or 12 weeks to reach a goal or set objectives in that term or timester. Then you take a break. I haven’t seen any studies, but I believe you could argue that it is more natural for us to work like this than to be expected to work week in and week out. Thinking about this a bit more, our ancestors used to work according to the seasons and this required short bursts of activity – sowing and harvesting being the busiest times.

Thirdly, in the UK and European countries the first 6 months of a new job are pretty tenuous anyway as they just offer 1 weeks notice. When taking on a contractor you can offer 1 month notice for the first 6 months. This is a great deal for the contractor as they actually have far greater certainty (ie a month) than if they have a full time employment contract. The point about the contractual structure is that you don’t offer one month notice for ever and you don’t allow it be silently become two months or three months or six months as they spend more time in your organisation. This will make a considerable difference if some relocation is required.

Fourthly, freelancers who leave your organisation can and do come back – if they enjoyed their work with you – and often come back more motivated and with a fresh set of ideas. This is great for both the freelancer and for your business.

Fifthly, not all brilliant candidates will fit your company culture. Think of football. How many times does a great manager turn down the offer of a great player because the great player wouldn’t fit into the team? It happens all the time. You are looking to fill roles in your company, that doesn’t mean you want the best player, you want the best fit.

Sixthly, men (or women) are as their times are. This is a line from Shakespear when a young soldier complains when he is told to carry out a contract killing. His Sargent replies that he should go and do it for  ’men are as their times are’. Often your ‘good’ people in a high growth company will become your ‘bad’ people in a sudden slow down. This isn’t because they have changed, only your company circumstances have changed and their motivations within the company and those circumstances may have changed out of all recognition.

A freelance or contractual structure allows you to let them go quickly and without fuss. The cleanness of the parting of the waves is actually a lot less controversial than you might think and allows you to rebuild the relationship with them later on, should conditions improve.

At the end of the day, you are looking for the best fit for the role you have now.  If you markets and products change, the role may well change. If you switch from high growth to low growth or a sharp decline, most of your people won’t fit any more no matter how good they were in the first place.

Lastly, if you have decided on an entrepreneurial structure then you need the best fit with that – enterprising people. And I can guarantee you they will not be standard employees looking for the apparent security of a standard employment contact, as that is the last thing either you or they want.

Enterpreneurs are particularly bad at recruiting

Now, that is a strong statement, but it comes from an industry veteran who has years and years of helping businesses recruit the right person for the job, so it is an opinion that carries some weight.

So, why is this so? Is it because an entrepreneur sees opportunity in everything but isn’t aware of the downside? Is it because we believe that anything can be done if you just get on and do it, but non-entrepreneurs just aren’t like that?

Or some other reason?